12. It's important to understand this basic distinction between the two. Side effects for the meds work the same way. You don't get the "high" feeling addicts experience as quickly with the extended release formulation as you do with the immediate release formulation. Imagine you are a code-head and you are jonesing for some opioids and you get one that takes up to 6 hours for you to feel your high. The actual people who are addicted to this stuff and abuse it all go for the immediate release
14. Oxycontin is also dramatic in price. This is from our distributor. So to paint a picture. a strung out drug addict living in squalor would have to pay nearly 1500 dollars for 100 pills of something that will get them high 6 hours after they take the pill. This is simply not happening. The drug of choice for addicts are the immediate release formulations made by companies such as KVK or mallinkrodt that cost less than 10% of the price.
15. I would also like to point out the name of another medication called buprenorphine. This is a medication that is designed specifically as an anti-addiction drug. It has shown to be very effective in weaning patients off of oxycodone. It is the gold standard treatment for addicts that go to the the clinics for help(in adjunct with behavioral therapy and mental therapy of course)
18. Conclusion: So did purdue pharma have a role in the opioid crisis? in my opinion, even if they did, it was minimal. If you're going to go the route of "oh it's big pharma's fault for creating the drug in the first place", purdue is probably one of the least culpable for the opioid crisis with their extended release formulation that very few abusers(if any) actually use. But it does seem like they will likely be scapegoated and sacrificed in order to make a point.
19. The fall of purdue for this reason is not a good thing in my opinion. American pharmaceutical innovation is responsible for helping and extending the lives of billions across the globe. They do so with profits created from doing the exact same thing purdue did. If we want the same innovation that has kept the US light years ahead of other countries, pharma companies can't be scared to create, market, and sell their products.
Thank you, Drop great explanation. True, addicts want their high now — no waiting. I have taken the quick release for dental issues it works and only need it for a couple of days. Your expertise is appreciated. 💕
@JM No problem! wish there was a way to pull together my threads 😂 oh well, i'm sure the people who are interested will find a way to read it
I followed along, I can be OCD like that, 🤣
@watch4thedrop One of the best threads ever written on here! Great job!
@luvmycountry1 appreciate it brother!
@watch4thedrop good thread
Generics being least expensive were one's that I know were coming from pill mill doc's, say 6 months worth in 1 appt to take home with you. Think they will be next?
@Lemonhead I would say the crackdowns have been frequent the past 3 years. Probably accounts for the decrease in prescriptions. This is how you combat the problem!
This doctor(cubangbang) was a major problem in my area. Prescribed quantities of up to 200 oxy 30's per patient. Glad they got him off the streets
@watch4thedrop great info and sources thanks
I'm fascinated by the difference in our countries (I'm Aussie) and seems they must have much tighter controls over here. I was prescribed a variety of high dose SR opioids and other opioids for breakthrough pain for around 15 years (now off all painkillers yeay). I was only ever given 1 month's prescription and even that had to be granted by special authority by a govt dept who tracked it all.
Their were special protocols/conditions that had to be met to be prescribed i.e. had to be started by a specialist dr not just the local dr and that kind of thing. Had to also have approved reasons.
When i first started on the opioids the first prescription was by the specialist in hospital. The second was by the registrar (senior doctor who worked at the direction of the specialist) and then by my GP (local dr) they referred my care back to.
Despite it being a very low dose to begin with, they received a please explain letter notifying them of which doctors I had received prescriptions of the opioid from and when. They had to explain the situation, and help them understand I wasn't doctor shopping. Even so they had to decide amongst themselves who was going to be the one who would continue to give me prescriptions.
The system still gets abused of course but it's just interesting to me the difference.
The pharmacist could not fill the prescription if it did not have the special authority number on it. Was just a matter of the local dr ringing the dept to get it, and would have to provide the reason for the prescription.
Is your system like that at all? How do they keep tabs on it?
@Grammy @Lemonhead haha yes. it's just as strangulated here in the states. Over here, doctors need to register for a special ID number with the govt dept(DEA) in order to prescribe any opioids. DEA number must be on the prescription with the diagnosis. Also can only do a month at a time with 0 refills. There is also a statewide monitoring program that all pharmacists must report each dispensed prescriptions to to deter doctor/pharmacy shopping
Ok so similar restrictions, just done differently. I don't know what reporting pharmacists need to do as I wasn't involved in that process but I'm guessing similar. I know they track what prescriptions are filled so that makes sense.
So, is the reporting of over prescription of opioids by DRs overblown? If they have to follow those restrictions, can the problem be as big as they say? I'm always worried they will unduly restrict pain meds of those who truly need them.
@Grammy @Lemonhead We have the issue of doctors with actual licenses who game the system. They will open a fake practice and see addicts in their office for a couple of minutes, make up a fake diagnosis, and then give them a prescription for an obscene amount. Than the addict leaves the 300 dollars with the receptionist on their way out.
Thanks Lemonhead 🙂
1. I'm still in the process of healing - back injury from my days as a nurse (ruptured disc, surgery, long term sciatic pain and never damage complicated by the development of Tarlov cysts at the surgical site). I had a spinal cord stimulator at one point. Used walking sticks. Pain and quality of life issues were so bad I begged them to make me a paraplegic (thankfully they refused). ....cont
I'm not YET completely pain free but can cope without prescription meds.
I've radically changed my diet, my outlook, embraced natural therapies and I'm becoming more and more active over time. Have even been able to start running again - such freedom is a joy to experience again.
I know how bad pain can be and I worry for people who NEED the opioids. I pray that any crackdown on them does not make it more difficult for them to get the care and support they need.
Excellent thread!I have been following this story on Perdue, but have never seen the nuances you shared. Important nuances.
@barrsniffsatjejuneanalysis Yes. The mainstream narrative is just laughably narrow minded. shows maybe 10% of the picture. Not that we expect any better from those jackals. they do the same thing with Guns and trump
I'm in the medical device innovation industry. It is so important for our authorities to go after the correct root causes of an issue. We do not want bad drugs/devices/biologics out there, but we also do not want to squelch our medical innovation by punishing the wrong parties. Before I read your description of Purdue's oxycontin as the extended release version of the drug, I was not aware of the difference compared to the quick acting versions of oxycodone and the issues.
Some people take both Oxycontin and Oxycodone for severe spine pain.
An intrathecal pain pump helps quite a bit with pain that comes from within the spinal fluid area, but the other related pains still need to be treated with oral opioids. The new limits have made many patients lives barely bearable.
Responsible users are paying an extreme price because of the broad brush approach
@watch4thedrop Excellent thread,
DROP. Thank you.
Thank you for taking the time to write this thread. I appreciate you sharing your insight with us and educating us on the difference between immediate/extended release drugs.
This is good.
@watch4thedrop Excellent post!! ty
@watch4thedrop Awesome thread! Had no idea there is a slow and an immediate release drug.
If I was the addict, I would go for the highest dosage pills, and crush the time-release mechanism for immediate effect. Thus, because ER contin was the biggest dose, it was the fave for addicts. Is it more complicated than that?
I agree that time release is the best therapeutic effect, if for no other reason than to sleep 8 hours painfree. 0R
@0RETARD0 makes sense theoretically but why go theough all the trouble and pay all the extra money? you could just double or triple up on the IR tabs for less than 10% of the price. i have never had a junkie come in and ask for oxycontin before. they all want the immediate release. its just simpler and more cost effective with a faster high.
@watch4thedrop I agree they shouldn't be scared to research and innovate, but they MUST have a warning shot across the bow to be TRUTHFUL about the effects of their products and not force feed them to doctors. My dad was an orthopedic surgeon who retired in the early 1990's. He still had his ONLY pad of state mandated class one prescriptions. He used 5 in a number of years. His partner went through quite a few full pads. Doctors like my dad are gone sadly, but they all need to be accountable.
@watch4thedrop Fabulous thread. I completely agree. Many Anesthesiologists specialize in pain management as a career, and see a lot of chronic pain patients. Sometimes a well placed epidural or local anesthetic injection will work for months at a time. But Anesthesiologists write plenty of opioid prescriptions that work and help keep people living productively. Opioids must be available until we get something better . NSAID's work well, but their side affects can be prohibitive, esp in elderly.
@watch4thedrop I should add that opioids have their problems in the elderly as well, but you already know that.
@wziminer Yes opioids serve a necessary purpose. It is not perfect, but it is the best thing we have out right now and millions of patients are positively effected by these medications. Health care professionals like us need to keep things in perspective and combat the fake news narratives. Go us! lol
@watch4thedrop 😊 It's people like you that put it all into perspective. You are a valuable asset to SQV. I appreciate you taking the time to toot this thread.
@wziminer Haha thanks my friend! unfortunately Medical knowledge does not come paired with thread linking skills 😂
@watch4thedrop Hahahaha. Just keep replying to the toot before it. That's what I do, anyway. They still break up sometimes.
I think you've made a well argued point.
Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.