1. If the Swamp crooks haven't been frightened up to now, they'll be TERRIFIED now.

A G Barr appoints John Durham to review origins of Russian enquiry.

NOTE : NO SPECIAL COUNSEL. Barr's going to make this a hard-core, DOJ led investigation.

By one of DOJs toughest attorneys. A hard SOB, John Durham.

Oh, man.

nytimes.com/2019/05/13/us/poli

@REX

Also notice in the announcement of Durham the NYT cannot resist pushing the bulllshit narrative of the past 2.5 years.

The Mueller report reaffirmed that the F.B.I. opened its investigation based on legitimate factors, including revelations that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had told a diplomat from Australia, a close American ally, that he was informed that the Russians had stolen Democratic emails.

@REX

And this risible bullshit

F.B.I. agents and federal prosecutors also obtained approval from the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to wiretap Mr. Page after he left the campaign.

@robbakas

Don't worry.

The NYT can spew out as much BS as they want. Doesn't matter anymore.

Things are moving fast and events have gotten ahead of them.

Follow

@REX

Thanks, I'm not worried. Just was pointing out the lying narrative will not be abandoned until the bitter end.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
QuodVerum Forum

Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.