Since this is being mentioned now, it leads me to think they may be going through the boxes which were previously opened for the other "audits".
Depending on how those were conducted, and the Chain of Custody for them, this may not be an issue.
Or it's a massive fucking problem. I don't see a little of middle ground on this one.
Well, yes. Assuming competency, good procedures, good oversight, and good intentions.
With county and Secretary of States' reliance on Pro V/V audits... biting index finger in frustration, Erin.
@Erin there is a whole section from Fann's letter dedicated to this.
Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.
Aren’t they required to reseal and sign them in order to keep the chain of custody in tact?
That’s what the courts do when evidence is opened for examination. The person must reseal and sign the envelope containing the evidence.