Years ago, I noticed that in US public discourse, it's normal for all sides to be wrong.
Take Trump's decision to not retaliate against Iran for shooting down a reconnaissance drone.
Apparently I am the only person on earth--besides Trump, Putin, and the people involved--who knows that Trump inflicted the worst military defeat on Russian in the entire history of the United States.
On February 7, 2018, near Deir Ezzor, Syria, we completed destroyed a Russian assault battalion called a Mobile Detachment Combat Group.
Back to Carlson.
Bombing Iran would not have ended Trump's political career.
The strikes would have been limited.
Carlson is under the delusion that an American strike will trigger a full-on war.
How can anybody think that? It's demented.
Carlson let's slip that he's a mullah fanboy.
He says, Iran is an impressive place, "not at all like the chintzy, prefab capitals of the Arab world, like Riyadh or Dubai."
This anti-Arab bigotry is laughable, given the Third Revolution in Military Affairs.
Then Carlson warns us about John Bolton.
For some reason, everyone forgets that National Security Advisors can only talk.
Bolton can't take us to war.
Then we have an idiot on MSNBC tell us that Trump is an isolationist.
See what I mean about everyone being wrong?
On which planet is Trump an isolationist.
Mike Pence is a co-president and Secretary of State in one.
Mike Pompeo has done more than all previous Secretaries of State combined.
Trump is a nationalist internationalist. America first, but we won't turn our back on the world.
What's up with the people warning us about John Bolton? Our Donald seems content enough with Bolton.
👆 No wrong again. He’s on a roll.
@ThomasWic past air strikes occurred before Iran built up their military weaponry. No one can guess with certainty how a country would react to being attacked. Carlon's guess is as good as anyone's, and it's at least based on Iran's rhetoric and their current capabilities. A counterattack could even be unconventional and plausibly deniable. Best not to guess to much about those kinds of things.
" Carlon's guess is as good as anyone's, and it's at least based on Iran's rhetoric and their current capabilities. "
2) Carlton "guessing" is as good as Trump's KNOWING?
3) Carlton's "guessing" based on IRAN's rhetoric?
4) Carlton's "guessing" based on Iran's "current capabilities?"?"
5) A Counterattack "plausibily deniable?
AND, the Piece of Resistance....
6) Best not to "guess" too much about "those" kinds of things?
Are you the "Q"?
Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.