1. Oh BOY.
There was ANOTHER EO.
We have all been focussing on Trump's EO 13848 'Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election', declared on 14 September 2018.
Exactly 1 week later, Trump signed EO 13849
'Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions Set Forth in the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act.'
2. This second EO cuts off the blood supply to any sanctioned entity or individual in EO 13848 - MONEY.
Including DOMESTIC players.
Trump had all domestic and foreign players in his crosshairs in September 2018.
Just a few weeks before the Democrat Crime Syndicate had their first go at widespread election fraud - the 6 Nov 2018 mid terms.
Oh, another thing. Did you know that individual SCOTUS judges have individual power over specific Federal Circuit Courts?
3. They have the power to supervise lower courts as individual judges.
Including fast tracking cases to the FULL COURT.
And look what happened on Oct 19, 2018. A sudden change.
GEORGIA - went to Thomas
WISCONSIN- went to Kavanaugh
PENNSYLVANIA- went to Alito
8D CHESS, folks.
4. TWO EOs and a SCOTUS shuffle in September & October 2018.
And the idiots never saw it.
Those involved in this great crime against the people, President and Constitution of the United x are right royally F'd.
Only they don't know it.
Enjoy the show.
Does that mean they will be cutting off the democrats money?
@REX thank you for your research, I will be passing in on to my husband who does not believe me when I tell him Trump will be the president. He is so infuriating as he patronizes me.
And when do you expect the fireworks to begin, I want a front row seat. We don't shoot we just clip their funds.
Trump and his team must have something secret in store that can nullify state certifications, otherwise they would be acting far more worried about places like Georgia, which is about to knowingly certify fraudulent votes.
@Itbj2 @MrHobbit @REX On this occasion , I have absolutely no way to even speculate. I am not familiar with election law procedures nor what info the POTUS has. All I know is that the legislature/SCOTUS will be absolutely inclined NOT to nullify an election unless incredible information is produced. I have not seen this incredible information yet.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm . . . damn good notice, Rex.
"The agencies anticipated to be impacted by this executive order include the Departments of State, the Treasury, and Homeland Security, the Export-Import Bank, and the Federal Reserve System."
Wow, very impressive! Good eye, @REX 🙂
As always, the focus of the people keeps changing, while the most brutal strikes remain hidden (sometimes in plain sight), and are kept to the end.
A brilliant strategist, and a genius showman combined, that is DJT.
And yes, we'll enjoy this show, and will soon have a lot to tell to all those who kept mocking us as ``disseminating conspiracy theories'' and other mediocre BS.
"All wars are won or lost before they are even fought" Sun Tzu
Thanks for the info. As always, you da man!
@REX this is another master stroke that slipped under the Bolsheviks' radar. Oct 21 (apologies if you already mentioned it, I have been moving for a week and off the internet):
"Faithful execution of the law requires that the President have appropriate management oversight regarding this select cadre of professionals."
@REX You forgot to state the obvious. Biden is a security risk.
@REX as someone who hasn't followed SCOTUS cases much, I wonder how "lefty swampy" the liberal justices, Sotomayor and Kagan, are?
If someone would bring strong evidence of unconstitutional behavior before them, would they consider it on it's merit? Or would they ignore it and just vote accordingly to how leftist ideology would want them to vote?
I would like to believe that liberal SCOTUS justices are of higher moral caliber than democrat politicians.
They're appointed by partisans.but to be fair to SCOTUS, these judges are the best of the best.
They are legal GENIUSES.
That doesn't mean they're infallible. And there's a big difference in quality, between them. Obama was useless - many say that his judicial appointments were very poor.
It's academic now, anyway. Trump has a strong majority.
@REX. If only I could give this thread 10 stars...
@REX how about NV and AZ?
Long-time follower of yours on Twitter, etc., here.
Considering that Boris Epshteyn has been mentioning New Mexico as a state to keep an eye on, as a venue for a further possible Federal equal-protection lawsuit, it may be worth noting who has been assigned responsibility for the Tenth Circuit, namely, Neil Gorsuch.
Yes, or the battlefields. (While I think it's safe to say that several of the Democrat judges who've been hearing some of these cases, such as those on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, are in contact ex parte with their allies in other offices or elsewhere, I doubt the same could be said of conservatives or textualists on the bench, at least in general. This circumstance would have both some advantages and some disadvantages, it seems to me.)
Just listened to an interview that Sidney Powell did yesterday and she states that she doesn’t know if the ‘good’ guys got the server or the ‘bad’ guys got it. How could she not know this by now?
That statement seemed like a "walk back" of the one she made during her interview on Glenn Beck.
Maybe she does know, but she wants to lull the perpetrators into a sense of false security.
Maybe the Trump campaign is asking her to feign ignorance.
Maybe it's sitting at one of the government agencies that could be on the other side.
For whatever reason, that felt like a bit of strategy going on.
@REX Unfortunately Sotomayor has Michigan and Kagan has AZ and Nevada.
@REX Weird. What's your thoughts on the left leaning Roberts supervising DC?
☠️ No Quarter No Mercy 🏴for these evil enemies of our great POTUS and the USA 🇺🇲.
Justice overdue ⚖
@REX Is that why it was Alito who issued the order to Pennsylvania to keep late-arriving mail ballots separate?
* Which order they ignored.
@REX Not sure this has been referenced but today, 20 Nov, another change:
• DC Roberts, Chief Justice
• 1st Breyer,
• 2nd Sotomayor,
• 3rd Alito,
• 4th Roberts, Chief Justice
• 5th Alito,
• 6th Kavanaugh,
• 7th Coney Barrett,
• 8th Kavanaugh,
• 9th Kagan,
• 10th Gorsuch,
• 11th Thomas,
• Fed Roberts, Chief Justice
This is correct - and in my opinion, very significant.
@REX No doubt about it.
Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!
@REX I learned that this summer while reading up on circuit courts. Check out Thomas, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch's assignments. Spectacularly awesome! https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitAssignments.aspx?fbclid=IwAR0VamXsBDbYe3KoIAIBiH-A_n6ucY1ZaH5EK2LTPbzRlAdeGTE2_4cOSHM
@REX Should have known you would have included this information.
@REX Circuit Assignments effective November 20, 2020
Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.