(1) Unless you have been under a rock for the last two years, you have been either pestered by, or fallen for the "Q-larp," a singular hoax some folks with an IQ lower than Joe Biden's like to call the "Q Movement."
The fact that their promoters were exposed a long time ago matters not.
@ThomasWic and I have been pointing to them from the start.
Even NBC caught up.
(9) You see, in the darker side of the "Q Movement" from day one, we find the same characters that pestered us with "Pizzagate."
The same ones who hate Rosenstein and Kushner.
The ones that mix some truth with the Federal Reserve, Rosenstein, the Rothchilds...and come up the other side with shit.
Trump was a fool controlled by McMaster, the puppet of Soros and the "Jewish Cabal"!
Hillary, a Satanist!
I bet you she drunk the blood of babies, too, while partying with McMaster.
(10) The crazies soon flocked to it like flies on shit.
One threatened to kill POTUS in Pennsylvania, another was going to blow up Hoover dam, another started a forest fire in California, and the anti-Semites prospered in the melee.
Are all Q foloweres anti-Semitic?
Not by a long shot.
But way too many are, and the canard is being pushed by more of these every day. day.
(11) All of the revelations late last year caused some of the early pushers to distance themselves, even as they resorted to an old circular argument.
No, morons, to expose a hoax is not born out of fear.
It's a matter of sanitation.
We take the garbage out not because it threatens us, but because it smells.
(14) I've always classified the minions of Q in three broad categories:
Q-tips, the mostly harmless folk who read this crap
Q-tards, the morons who believe the larp; and
Q-turds, the asswipes who promote it.
In QuodVerum we have so far taken an almost bening approach. Not always easy.
While it is no secret we discourage the larp, we have been quite tolerant of those who bring cretins like Tracy Beanfartz or Alex Jones through the back door. But this is now getting to be particularly vexing.
(15) Q is not a benign form of entertainment.
It is a serious hoax that promotes illegal and unconstitutional behavior (military patrols, Military tribunals for common criminals, incarceration in Guantanamo for for political opponents), spreads damaging rumors (Trump a prisoner in the White House), propagates conspiracy theories (Judeo-Masonic plans to take over the country, Rothchild conspiracy, Kushner, Rosenstein, et al) and creates unrealistic expectations...
(16) ...thereby setting honest followers up for disappointment (jail time for all and their mothers, 70,000 secret indictments, etc.), a particularly insidious way to undermine the Trump administration.
Why do white Supremacists and Anarchists join in the dissemination of this larp?
Well, call it a marriage of convenience.
They are both collectivists, they are both anti-Semitic and both hate Trump.
(17) But, but!
Q "woke" people and made them research!
Spare me the bullshit.
Q captured the imagination of dolts and sent them on a fool's errand, at best.
Not even that.
It pulled the wool over the eyes of otherwise good people who ended up playing the useful idiot to the manipulations of Tracy Diaz, Jerome Corsi or Paul Furber, or any other unscrupulous character suckling the conspiracy tit.
(20) "Most recently, Tracy has been recognized by Zerohedge, The Gateway Pundit, and Infowars..."
She's moving up to the East Side, to a de luxe apartment in the sky...
(21) And the best:
"To me, as an Anarchist..those of us who have been through an evolution...Staying together against the machine, as an Anarchist, a Libertarian or a Republican..."
One can't make this shit up.
The little creep an activist for a "Global Revolution" just about yesterday.
From the horse's mouth. Or from the horse's arse, as you may prefer:
(22) The other two you can find for find for yourselves. Easy peasy.
Enough is enough.
As we go into the election cycle, ours will not be a platform for the likes of Anarchist TracyBeanz to call attention to her destructive crap, or for crazy ass peddlers of hate to sow propaganda.
Nor for any other America-hating SOB to sow discord.
If any of you reading this has any legitimate questions, I am at your disposal for the next 48 hours to answer them.
(24) Q-tards may get a polite request to abstain.
One request only.
Q-turds, as of June 1st, will no longer be welcome.
This is the only warning they will receive.
I'm getting too old and this place is getting too busy to waste time on people whose interest is not to have a meaningful conversation but to promote a destructive hoax by any means.
No trolls means no trolls.
No spam means no spam.
Or, in other words...
No Q promotion means no Q promotion.
A wonderful and always timely thread, Sir.
I like to call them Qanonsense peddlers too.
I recently had one of them reply to a tweet of mine, tagging in a bunch of others, so I went and carried out prophylactic blocking of the lot of them.
I remember when they were harassing Seb Gorka so much that Don Jr. had to vouch for him on twitter.
But why trust close confidants with direct access to the President when you can trust an anon account on a message board instead! 🙄
2) @Debradelai @Elaines2cents @CM_hd1 @GodlessNZ
Decided to follow Saul, Thomas,Brian,a few others.Some people i followed i realised were wrong(im sure i still do follow some,but only because i dont have time to delete them) .A friend on Twitter who IS military intel clued me in,and by then Id found Rex Brian,Saul and Thomas.I KNEW i was on track with them.So grateful to you guys
You're right of course.
While I think it's nothing more than a game to most, the hard core believers, analyzing the nonsense that is fed to them each day, while concerning when they're on the attack mode, to me they're no different than any other person believing the latest conspiracy theory.
Should I be more concerned and take it more seriously than I do?
When POTUS ordered airstrikes after Assad's chemical attacks in 2017 and 2018, Seb Gorka was almost alone in publicly facing the naysayers in public. He earned my eternal respect for doing that.
Tucker, Ingraham, Rand Paul, Jack Posobiec and others were quite happy to throw POTUS under the bus for enforcing the red line under the rule of law.
OANN even said the chemical attacks were a hoax. Directly defying POTUS.
I remember that! It was like watching a kung fu master whip an entire army of freaks.
@Debradelai @Seedsaver @Dubby @GodlessNZ
Over the years I've watched people like Thomas & Brian nigh effortlessly sail past serious trolling & Con Artists.
Their Filter is SIMPLE.
Opinion off of Open Sourced Material is fine & even speculation over anonymous Material is acceptable.
But that is NOT what they're doing.
They are NOT speculating.
They are deceiving people.
@EngOnDemand It looks like the Q well has run dry for him. Not a mention of it in the last week.
@Debradelai A lot like the “Former Intel” asswipes all over social media and media pushing their “inside” knowledge - I will never forget Gen Flynn followed me on Twatter after I wrote a thread on those “Report For The President” website losers.
All self promoting peacocks puffed up pushing conspiracies - they all suck balls
Great thread Mr. Saul
Well I'm not going to let Qanonsense peddlers force me to stop even using the letter Q.
I'm a huge Bond films fan and was reading an article about the franchise the other day. I saw the Bond Q mentioned and felt a bit disappointed that the name of such a great character and real life office-holder has been dragged through the mud. So I am reclaiming the real Q of MI6.
@Debradelai Excellent thread. I never saw the early stages of Q making bold predictions, but I saw a lot of the vague ones. And I couldn't believe it when people would use an event and say, "See! Q predicted it!"
One instance of this was a shooting. I don't remember which one. But they took a vague Q post and used the date or maybe it was the time, and said, "Wow! Q knew this was coming."
Obviously I knew before that Q was a bunch of malarky, but that was the final nail. People are insane.
Those who label words as violence do so with the sole purpose of justifying violence against words.